On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 09:48:40AM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > Is this the same issue that was discussed in [1]? > > [1] > https://postgr.es/m/oscpr01mb14966ff9e4c4145f37b937e52f5...@oscpr01mb14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Ah, indeed, so it was reported a couple of months ago. I am not sure that the argument about all the other GUCs potentially impacted holds much value; we are talking about a specific code path. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
