Jianghua Yang <yjhj...@gmail.com> writes: > I wanted to ask if this patch can be merged first, as it seems to be a > separate issue different from the aclitem parsing problem Tom discussed in > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3792884.1751492172%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Merging your patch will make it more difficult to poke at these underlying issues, so I'm not in a hurry to do that. It's not like this is an urgent issue: initdb has behaved like that for years if not decades, and nobody's complained before. regards, tom lane