Tender Wang <tndrw...@gmail.com> 于2025年7月3日周四 17:48写道：
> > > Andrei Lepikhov <lepi...@gmail.com> 于2025年7月3日周四 17:23写道： > >> On 3/7/2025 04:02, Tender Wang wrote: >> > >> > >> > Andrei Lepikhov <lepi...@gmail.com <mailto:lepi...@gmail.com>> 于2025年7 >> > 月2日周三 22:29写道： >> > >> > On 30/6/2025 04:38, Tender Wang wrote: >> > > Do you think it's worth doing this? >> > > >> > > >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > I have added this patch to commitfest[1]. I'm hoping someone can >> > review >> > > it for me. >> > It makes sense to apply. If you return the comment to its place, you >> > may >> > reduce the patch size even more. >> > >> > >> > Thanks for reviewing. I returned the comment to its place. Please >> review >> > the attached patch. >> Do you really need to initialise clauses with the NIL value? I guess, it >> may be avoided because later you non-alternatively init it with a copy >> of hash clauses. >> > > Yeah, no need to initialize clauses to NIL. > Please take a look at the attached v3 patch. And I have changed the status to Ready for Committer in the [1]. [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5704/ -- Thanks, Tender Wang
v3-0001-If-we-have-a-single-hashclause-list_copy-hashclau.patch
Description: Binary data
