On Sat, Jul 05, 2025 at 02:00:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Here's a fleshed-out implementation of Hayato-san's idea. I've > not done anything about reverting 5a6c39b6d, nor have I done any > checks to see if there are other GUCs we ought to mark similarly. > (But at this point I'd be prepared to bet that there are.)
I've been reading through the patch (not tested), and no objections with the concept here. I would have kept that a HEAD-only change due to the proposed location for SetProcessingMode(), but, well, if I'm in minority that's fine by me. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
