On Sat, Jul 05, 2025 at 02:00:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Here's a fleshed-out implementation of Hayato-san's idea.  I've
> not done anything about reverting 5a6c39b6d, nor have I done any
> checks to see if there are other GUCs we ought to mark similarly.
> (But at this point I'd be prepared to bet that there are.)

I've been reading through the patch (not tested), and no objections
with the concept here.  I would have kept that a HEAD-only change due
to the proposed location for SetProcessingMode(), but, well, if I'm
in minority that's fine by me.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to