> On 8 Jul 2025, at 11:21 PM, Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 07:17:54PM +0800, Florents Tselai wrote: >> I can't see how it's possible to get the actual size for the dsa and dsh >> case, >> without attaching and then using, dsa_get_total_size on the attached dsa. >> And I don't think we wanna do that. >> >> Instead maybe we can just report NULL for the dsa and dsh cases? > > Yeah, I'm not sure what else we can do about that without a bunch of > refactoring work on the DSA/dshash side, and it's probably not worth the > effort, anyway. I agree. In that case I think v5 should be enough.
- Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but fine-grained for DSM re... Nathan Bossart
- Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but fine-grained for D... Florents Tselai
- Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but fine-grained f... Nathan Bossart
- Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but fine-grain... Florents Tselai
- Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but fine-g... Nathan Bossart
- Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but f... Florents Tselai
- Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but f... Nathan Bossart
- Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but f... Nathan Bossart
- Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but f... Florents Tselai
- Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but f... Nathan Bossart
- Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but f... Florents Tselai
- Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but f... Nathan Bossart
- Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but f... Florents Tselai
- Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but f... Nathan Bossart