On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 01:52:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I considered putting the sortsupport functions first, since they have a >> lower support function >> number, but I thought defining them in the same order as we've been doing >> was a tiny bit safer. >> Maybe that is superstitious. > > Yeah, I'd be inclined to swap them. I dislike code that has no > ordering principle other than feature development order.
Ordering them by number in the unified script makes more sense here. > LGTM other than that nit. Michael, do you want to do the > honors, or shall I? Sure, I can look at that today. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
