On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:40:55AM -0500, Nico Williams wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:50:24PM +0000, Nasby, Jim wrote: > > On Aug 14, 2018, at 4:01 PM, Nico Williams <n...@cryptonector.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 03:00:55PM +0000, Robert Haas wrote: > > >> The more I think about it, the more I think having a way to set a > > >> lexically-scoped search path is probably the answer. [...] > > > > > > Yes please! > > > > > > This is what I want. Evaluate the search_path at function definition > > > time, and record code with fully-qualified symbols in the catalog. > > > > Unfortunately, that falls apart for relocatable extensions. > > It would only require recomputing the bindings at relocation time. IMO > PG should not allow extension relocation after installation either, but > sadly it does.
Agreed. I wouldn't mind deprecating relocatable=true, if it helps.
