On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:52:19AM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote: >> Another random thought: I worry that the dshash approach might be quite a >> bit slower, and IIUC we just need to map an integer to a string. Maybe we >> should just use a DSA for LWLockTrancheNames. IOW we'd leave it as a char** >> but put it in shared memory. > > To use DSA just for this purpose, we would need to maintain an array of > dsa_pointers that reference the string(s), right? I am not clear what you > mean by using dsa to put the char**
I was imagining putting the array in one big DSA allocation instead of carting around a pointer for each tranche name. (Sorry, I realize I am hand-waving over some of the details.) -- nathan
