On Thu, 2025-07-17 at 11:59 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-07-17 at 08:30 +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > I wasn't aware how Oracle handles case mapping, but it seems you
> > are right:
>
> How does it handle UPPER('ß')? If the result is 'ß', that means it's
> similar to the builtin C.UTF-8. If the result is 'SS', that means it's
> similar to PG_UNICODE_FAST.
It returns 'ß'.
> > I'm still a little bit worried that changes in the case mapping might
> > break some indexes. We have a track record with going against the
> > standard when it comes to case conversion, so perhaps we wouldn't
> > spill too much milk if we only convert ASCII correctly.
> >
> > But perhaps I am just being paranoid.
>
> That's a reasonable concern, and I don't mean to dismiss it. But I
> believe that problem is two orders of magnitude smaller than the
> problems we have with the status quo.
I agree with that.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
