Etsuro Fujita <[email protected]> writes:
> On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 2:02 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Finally, here's a minimalistic version of the original v1-0001
>> patch that I think we could safely apply to fix the DirectModify
>> problem in the back branches. I rejiggered it to not depend on
>> inventing MemoryContextUnregisterResetCallback, so that there's
>> not hazards of minor-version skew between postgres_fdw and the
>> main backend.
> Seems reasonable.
Pushed the larger patchset now. I had to do a little more work
to get it to play with 112faf137, but it wasn't hard.
regards, tom lane
