On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 1:13 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, that makes sense to me. For HEAD and PG18, we can still add a new > argument to the API. For other bank branches, it is better to use a > new Ex function as suggested by Kuroda-San. >
Here are the updated patches. I have added "Ex functions" for back branches (PG_17 and earlier) , which also have Asserts for making sure locks are taken. For PG_18 and HEAD, I've used the extra parameter already_locked. PG_14_15-v6-0001-Fix-a-deadlock-during-ALTER-SUBSCRIPTION.-DROP-PU.patch is for both PG_14 and PG_15 and PG_18_HEAD-v6-0001-Fix-a-possible-deadlock-during-ALTER-SUBSCRIPTION is for both PG_18 and HEAD. regards, Ajin Cherian Fujitsu Australia
PG_14_15-v6-0001-Fix-a-deadlock-during-ALTER-SUBSCRIPTION.-DROP-PU.patch
Description: Binary data
PG_16-v6-0001-Fix-a-deadlock-during-ALTER-SUBSCRIPTION.-DROP-PU.patch
Description: Binary data
PG_18_HEAD-v6-0001-Fix-a-possible-deadlock-during-ALTER-SUBSCRIPTION.patch
Description: Binary data
PG_17-v6-0001-Fix-a-deadlock-during-ALTER-SUBSCRIPTION.-DROP-PU.patch
Description: Binary data
