On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 at 11:19, "Euler Taveira" <eu...@eulerto.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2025, at 10:33 AM, Andres Freund wrote: >> Huh, the startup process is among the most crucial things to monitor? >> > > Good point. Fixed. > > After collecting some suggestions, I'm attaching a new patch contains the > following changes: > > - patch was rebased > - include Alvaro's patch (v2-0001) [1] as a basis for this patch > - add ioworker as new backend type > - add startup as new backend type per Andres suggestion > - small changes into documentation > >> I don't know what I think about the whole patch, but I do want to voice >> *strong* opposition to duplicating a list of all backend types into multiple >> places. It's already painfull enough to add a new backend type, without >> having >> to pointlessly go around and manually add a new backend type to mulltiple >> arrays that have completely predictable content. >> > > I'm including Alvaro's patch as is just to make the CF bot happy and to > illustrate how it would be if we adopt his solution to centralize the list of > backend types. I think Alvaro's proposal overcomes the objection [2], right? >
If we set the log level for all backend types, I don't think a generic log level is necessary. -- Regards, Japin Li ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.
