On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 11:25:53PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 1:01 PM Mircea Cadariu <cadariu.mir...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Overall, I like the change. But I have one question: should this be treated >> as >> a bug fix that we back-patch to supported branches, or is it more of >> an improvement that should only go into master? >> >> I reckon it might make sense to back-patch it to previous versions, as users >> might not upgrade always to the latest version. > > I understand your point. But on second thought, since the patch changes > behavior, I'm leaning toward treating it as an improvement, so it should > only go to master...
I also am leaning towards treating this as v19 material. It's a nontrivial behavior change, and this option is useful for major version upgrades, which is an area that we really don't want to surprise users too much. Furthermore, auto-analyze doesn't process partitioned tables, either, so this introduces a bit of divergence. (I'd love to see that project picked up again someday. Perhaps I will take a gander...) -- nathan
