On Saturday, August 18, 2018, Dave Cramer <p...@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
> > I was referring to: > > "Materialized views are a type of relation so it is not wrong, just one > of many instances where we generalize to "relation" based in implementation > details ins team of being explicit about which type of relation is being > affected." > > As being push back. > > I don't have an opinion on back patching this. > > I was arguing against back patching on the basis of defining this as a bug. It's not wrong nor severe enough to warrant the side effects others have noted. David J.
