On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 5:19 PM Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 5, 2025 at 9:50 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 5:06 PM Ashutosh Bapat > > <ashutosh.bapat....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 4:03 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Now, seeing this report, it seems the customer(s) are probably okay to > > > > skip a missing publication and let replication continue. So, we should > > > > consider backpatching this change but it would be better if few more > > > > people can share their opinion on this matter. > > > > > > Including Tomas for his opinion. Who else do you think can provide an > > > opinion based on experience? > > > > > > > I don't have any particular names in mind but Dilip and Sawada-San > > names are listed as reviewers in the commit [1], so it would be good > > to see what are their thoughts on this. > > > > Please note that this behavior is from the time logical replication > > was introduced, so we need to be a bit careful in changing the > > behavior in backbranches. > > Agreed. > > Only Dilip has expressed an opinion so far. Haven't heard from others, > so can't guess what their opinions are. >
Yeah, let's wait for a few more days. Even if we decide to backpatch it, let's target the next minor release. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
