On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 7:26 PM Paul A Jungwirth <p...@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote: > Thanks for taking a look! Here are new patches with those extra tests. > There are extensive regress tests already, so I just tested the same > concurrency pattern. I think the results are okay. I do get a > can't-serialize exception for a couple valid changes under REPEATABLE > READ and SERIALIZE, but I think they are expected and not a bug. (I > think you would see the same thing outside of FKs.)
0001 and 0003 look OK to me on a quick read-through. 0002 seems to do something horrible to isolation_schedule. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
