On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 06:59:55PM +0300, Andrey Borodin wrote: > FPWs are used here and there in a lot of places, like "FPI for > hint". And indexes are build using FPI for many years, it did not > start with 17... > This list is not exhaustive in any case, so I agree that formulation > should not be very strict.
Perhaps, yes, the formulation used in this paragraph could be a bit more evasive. What we do not want is to keep a wording that would require more maintenance each time the internals of the backend are changed, so adding an extra "like" may be OK. Do any of you have a specific wording in mind? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
