On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 10:12 PM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > As far as I know, we only have the following unambiguous performance > regressions (that clearly need to be fixed): > > 1. This issue. > > 2. There's about a 3% loss of throughput on pgbench SELECT.
I did a quick pgbench SELECT benchmark again with Andres' patch, just to see if that has been impacted. Now the regression there is much larger; it goes from a ~3% regression to a ~14% regression. I'm not worried about it. Andres' "not waiting for already-in-progress IO" patch was clearly just a prototype. Just thought it was worth noting here. -- Peter Geoghegan
