On Sun, Aug 17, 2025 at 4:34 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Or if you don't like those odds, maybe it'd be OK to keep % but use it
> rarely and without the CAS that can fail.

... or if we wanted to try harder to avoid %, could we relegate it to
the unlikely CLOCK-went-all-the-way-around-again-due-to-unlucky-scheduling
case, but use subtraction for the expected periodic overshoot?

    if (hand >= NBuffers)
    {
        hand = hand < Nbuffers * 2 ? hand - NBuffers : hand % NBuffers;
        /* Base value advanced by backend that overshoots by one tick. */
        if (hand == 0)
            pg_atomic_fetch_add_u64(&StrategyControl->ticks_base, NBuffers);
    }


Reply via email to