On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 02:19:06PM +1200, David Rowley wrote: > On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 at 13:26, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Yeah, it's really quite unclear what the existing HASH_DEBUG printout >> is good for. At least in our usage, it doesn't tell you anything >> you can't discover from static code analysis. I'm +1 for just >> dropping it altogether. > > I'm starting to lean more towards that myself. I had mostly just been > motivated to finding a way to prevent it from existing in a broken > state again.
+1. > HASH_STATISTICS I can imagine is more useful as that information isn't > otherwise recorded anywhere. By the way, once we have reached a conclusion here, I'll go update one of my animals to use what's remaining of the flags, so as this is captured in the future. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
