> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 03:52:33PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote: > > If we limit the tranche name to NAMEDATALEN and also limit the > > number of tranches an extension can register, we can put this > > all in static shared memory (We would still need to have a backend local > > cache to allow lookups to avoid going to shared memory). > > I bet we could avoid the local cache by keeping a backend-local copy of > LWLockCounter that gets updated as needed.
maybe. If we agree to impose limits ( both name length and # of tranches ), that will allow us to do things a bit different. If there is agreement on setting limits, may I propose 1024 tranches and NAMEDATALEN. Both seem reasonably sufficient. -- Sami
