On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 5:46 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 11:47 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 12:25 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > One idea to keep things simple for the first version is that we allow > > > users to specify the table_name for storing conflicts but the table > > > should be created internally and if the same name table already > > > exists, we can give an ERROR. Then we can later extend the > > > functionality to even allow storing conflicts in pre-created tables > > > with more checks about its schema. > > > > That's fair too. I am wondering what namespace we should create this > > user table in. If we are creating internally, I assume the user should > > provide a schema qualified name right? > > > > Yeah, but if not provided then we should create it based on > search_path similar to what we do when user created the table from > psql.
Yeah that makes sense. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar Google
