Marc-Olaf Jaschke <m...@dshare.de> writes:
> I can confirm that the patch fixes the issue (Bug #19030). The memory usage 
> remains within the expected range of work_mem.
> This also applies to parallel hash joins.
> The query also runs significantly faster.
> I also tested cases with multiple left joins.
> I have only observed this problem when there are many null values in the join 
> column.

Thanks for testing!

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to