On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 04:59:54PM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote: > > > But we have observed the generated code being pretty grotty and it's caused > > more than enough confusion - so let's just replace them with plain uint8's > > and > > cast in switches. > > +1 > > May be I am wrong, but it seems to me that after add-moissing-memory-barrier > patch was applied nobody reproduced assertion failure with replaced > bitfields. >
Hi, I am just a lurker but that was what I saw happen too. No problem with the replaced bitfields. Regards, Ken
