> On 3 Sep 2025, at 07:47, Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> - Hundreds of compiler warnings (They are not necessarily wrong, but it shows > that no one has taken care to tune the warnings or the code in any way > recently.) Should these be posted somewhere before they are lost in case anyone is keen on digging through the list for any relevant fixes? > So, can we declare that we don't support this compiler anymore? > > (gcc is readily available and seems to work alright, so I'm not saying the OS > is no longer viable.) +1 based on the findings above. -- Daniel Gustafsson
