Hi hackers! While doing some xlog-related task at my job I noticed inconsistency between [0] & [1]. hash_xlog.h xl_hash_squeeze_page structure description mismatches with actual code. PFA fixing issue.
I also allowed myself to standardise description of xl_hash_move_page_contents and xl_hash_init_bitmap_page, so xl_hash_delete, xl_hash_init_bitmap_page and xl_hash_move_page_contents describes their zeroth backup block akin to each other. [0] https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/postgresql.git/tree/src/include/access/hash_xlog.h?id=567d27e8e2b752743626eb259ba75ecdc936eaf3#n147 [1] https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/postgresql.git/tree/src/backend/access/hash/hash_xlog.c?id=567d27e8e2b752743626eb259ba75ecdc936eaf3#n830 -- Best regards, Kirill Reshke
v1-0001-Fix-comments-in-xlog.h.patch
Description: Binary data
