On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 9:51 AM Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 9:14 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2025 at 11:39 PM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coe...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > If the remote slot is inactive since long and lagging behind the > > > standby, this function (pg_sync_replication_slots) could end up > > > waiting indefinitely. While it can certainly be cancelled manually, > > > that behavior might not be ideal for everyone. That’s my > > > understanding; please let me know if you see it differently. > > > > > > > Such a case can be addressed by having additional timeout parameters. > > We can do that as an additional patch if the use case is important > > enough to address. > > > > Or we could rely on statement_timeout or the user cancelling the query > explicitly. >
Sure. thanks Amit and Ashutosh. -- With Regards, Ashutosh Sharma.
