On Tue, 2025-09-09 at 13:55 -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 11:16 AM Melanie Plageman
> <melanieplage...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > One more fix and a bit more cleanup in attached v4.
>
> Okay one more version: I updated the thread on eager flushing the
> bulkwrite ring [1], and some updates were needed here.
v5-0005 comments:
* Please update the comment above the code change.
* The last paragraph in the commit message has a typo: "potentially
update the local copy of min recovery point, when xlog inserts are
*not* allowed", right?
* Shouldn't the code be consistent between XLogNeedsFlush() and
XLogFlush()? The latter only checks for !XLogInsertAllowed(), whereas
the former also checks for RecoveryInProgress().
I'm still not sure I understand the problem situation this is fixing,
but that's being discussed in another thread.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
