On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 10:28:13AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote: > So I think there's no point in adding that cap, or any additional > checks in ExecChooseHashTableSize().
You are right that this hardcoded limit introduced in the previous patch was useless. So I have removed that, and applied the result. Thanks for the suggestion. Regarding removing the next power functions in dynahash.c, I am not sure if it is worth bothering much. Now that dynahash.h is removed, all the code duplication that was in the backend, without the hardcoded thresholds, is removed. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature