On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 11:35:42AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Between this and previously-identified problems (commits 81eaaa2c4, > f777d7738), it seems clear that extension_control_path (which is a new > thing in v18) was very poorly thought out. I wonder if it's too late > to revert it so that we can redesign it more carefully.
It would be too late once we are in GA, and we are not yet in GA. At this point I think that this should be Peter's call. I am not in his shoes, still I suspect like you that we may have not seen the end of it yet. If we're confident enough that we can fix anything, that's fine as a response to me, but discussions are also involving how available extensions are seen at catalog level. This bit is concerning for me, but I'm also of a pessimistic nature. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
