Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> writes:
> On 9/10/25 22:35, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This is silently assuming that sizeof(SortItem) is a multiple of
>> alignof(Datum), which on a 32-bit-pointer platform is not true
>> any longer. We ought to MAXALIGN the two occurrences of
>> data->numrows * sizeof(SortItem).
> You're right, I misunderstood which of the accesses is triggering the
> report. I added the two MAXALIGNs and can confirm that makes it go away
> on the rpi5. It's interesting it didn't happen on the i386 machine at
> all, but I don't have time to look at why right now.
I think it's just that i386 doesn't have hardware-level alignment
restrictions, or at least not ones for more than 4 bytes.
>> Do you want to fix it, or shall I?
> Feel free to do so. If not, I'll do that on Monday.
I can deal with it today, will go do so.
regards, tom lane
