On Thu, 18 Sept 2025 at 03:55, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree that we should prefer foo != NULL, but if the surrounding code > in a particular location just tests if (foo), then it may be better in > that case to go that route.
+1. I generally do (var != NULL) for pointers rather than (var). I think it makes the code easier to read as a reader instantly knows "var" is a pointer and not an int or bool. Also, agree that we can relax that a little when all the surrounding code does (var) David
