On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 5:04 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 4:56 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the review! Unless there are any objections, > > I’ll run the tests again and then push the patches. > > I've pushed patches 0001, 0002, and 0003. I'll push 0004 later.
I've pushed 0004, thanks! > Buildfarm member petalura reported a failure at [1] after 0001 was backpatched > to v13. However, the server logs show a "double free or corruption" error > occurring as the backend was exiting. Since that code was not touched by 0001, > for now I don't think this failure is related to the patch... > But am I missing something? After pushing 0004, petalura reported another failure with a "double free or corruption" error: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=petalura&dt=2025-09-18%2002%3A14%3A32 Buildfarm member phycodurus also reported similar failures: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=phycodurus&dt=2025-09-16%2011%3A09%3A07 https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=phycodurus&dt=2025-09-16%2016%3A44%3A37 I'll dig deeper into this issue. As for the unnecessary code for security labels on extensions you mentioned earlier, I've created a patch to remove it. Patch attached. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
v1-0001-pg_dump-Remove-unnecessary-code-for-security-labe.patch
Description: Binary data
