Hi,
Thanks for your detailed reply.
> I think that we could get rid of the initial_restart_lsn and just use
> s->data.restart_lsn here (while keeping initial xmin ones to preserve the
> intent of 818fefd8fd4 for those).
I agree with your proposed change.
> Your concern is only about the restart_lsn, right? (asking because I don't 
> think
> it's safe not to rely on the initial_* for the xmin ones, see [1]).
My primary concern is indeed the restart_lsn issue, and thanks again for the 
clear explanation.
Best regards,
suyu.cmj

Reply via email to