On 2018-Aug-28, Tom Lane wrote: > ... just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water ... > > Doesn't pg_backup_archiver.c's identify_locking_dependencies() need to > treat POLICY and ROW SECURITY items as requiring exclusive lock on > the referenced table? Those commands definitely acquire > AccessExclusiveLock in a quick test. > > I haven't looked hard, but I'm suspicious that other recently-added > dump object types may have been missed here too,
I hadn't come across this locking dependency before, so it's pretty likely that partitioned index attachment has a problem here. > and even more suspicious that we'll forget this again in future. ... yeah, it seems easy to overlook the need to edit this. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
