On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 at 21:05, Richard Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > FWIW, I complained about the stray check in has_useful_pathkeys() in > [1] last week, but you were quicker than me in making the code change > to remove it.
I missed that. I'm confident that line does nothing but waste cycles. A quick look at how those pathkeys are set in standard_qp_callback() should remove any uncertainty. David > [1] > https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4_zW5QU=zk32s17p8qwy+ga-3zutons+y+wopguiop...@mail.gmail.com
