On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 11:43 PM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 08:31:04AM +0500, Kirill Reshke wrote: > > Hi! Should we also bump XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC after d96f87332 & add323da40a > > or do we wait for full set to be committed? > > I may be missing something, of course, but d96f87332 has not changed > the WAL format, VISIBILITYMAP_ALL_VISIBLE and VISIBILITYMAP_ALL_FROZEN > existing before that. The change in xl_heap_prune as done in > add323da40a6 should have bumped the format number.
Oops! Thanks for reporting. I messed up and forgot to do this. And, if I'm not misunderstanding the criteria, I did the same thing at the beginning of September with 4b5f206de2bb. I've committed the bump. Hopefully I learned my lesson. - Melanie
