On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 7:30 PM Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote: > The error message showed the correct line number, but “syntax error” is > confusing. Shouldn’t it be something like “invalid configuration parameter: > default”?
I think so; see patch 0003 in [1]. --Jacob [1] https://postgr.es/m/CAOYmi%2BkYKPXCfiAF3xAu%2BcHYSLYEc4OC9Wsh2nebwWboNbkpeQ%40mail.gmail.com
