On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 08:09:18AM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 1:28 AM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote: >> Do we want to make the order of the checks to be more consistent in >> both routines? These would require a separate set of double-checks >> and review, but while we're looking at this area of the code we may as >> tweak it more.. > > That makes sense to me to avoid future questions such as mine.
Would somebody like to propose a patch? Doing so on this thread would be OK for me, but perhaps it would be better to discuss that on a new one as we would deal with a separate problem. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
