> > I wonder if we could be even more granular > > for the "normal autovacuum" case and point to the reason the table was > > chosen. For example, was it the insert threshold, the update/delete > > threshold, etc.? > > Sounds like reasonable information. I guess we might want to have such > information in a cumulative statistics view but do you think it's > better to have it in a dynamic statistics view?
+1 for this information in cumulative stats, on a per table level for sure. I do think however the pg_stat_all_tables views is getting too wide and moving new relation vacuum stats to a separate stats view will be very useful. -- Sami
