Hi, On Fri, 3 Oct 2025 at 18:47, Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2025-10-03 Fr 10:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes: > > If you look at this more closely, creating postgres-full.xml and running > the syntax check perform the same operations, except that the latter > throws away the output. So it seems redundant to build a whole new code > path for this. I think you can make the check target dependent on > postgres-full.xml and be done, kind of like this (starting from > pre-b2922562726): > > Would it be unreasonable to discard the "check" target altogether? > It made sense back in the day when actually building the html docs > took many minutes. But I haven't used it in years, so I wonder > if anyone else has either. > > I have no objection. We'll need to work out what we're doing on the meson > side, which is kinda where we came in ...
I can work on this but I want to clarify it first. Which one do you prefer: 1- We won't have any command to do syntax checks (including tab and nbsp), these checks will automatically run when we generate docs. 2- We will have a 'check' target but it will only do tab and nbsp checks; xmllint will run only when generating the docs. -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft
