On Oct 17, 2025, at 19:07, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:

> That seems overcomplicated: how does the buildfarm know
> what's a maintenance branch?  I think the rule should be
> just "run ABI checks if the control file exists, else not".
> 
> As an example of why that's better, what if we did decide
> we wanted ABI checks on master?

It’s part of the design of the build farm. The setup() function[0] checks 
various things to see if it should be run, e.g.,

```perl
        if ($^O ne 'linux')
        {
                emit("Only Linux is supported for ABICompCheck Module, 
skipping.");
                return;
        }

        # Only proceed if this is a stable branch with git SCM, not using msvc
        if ($conf->{scm} ne 'git')
        {
                emit("Only git SCM is supported for ABICompCheck Module, 
skipping.");
                return;
        }
        if ($branch !~ /_STABLE$/)
        {
                emit("Skipping ABI check; '$branch' is not a stable branch.");
                return;
        }
```

So as long as the branch naming remains consistent it should work.

D


[0] 
https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/pull/38/files#diff-207ca93813cc123f656dbb12b7723d305e9ade5e03d7b1cdb406180e4eaab9a2R194

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to