On Sat, 4 Oct 2025 at 21:24, Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 9:55 PM vignesh C <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > In the 0001 patch, pg_get_sequence_data() exposes two new fields > log_cnt and page_lsn. I see that the later subscriber-side patch uses > both, the first one in SetSequence(). It is not clear from the > comments or the commit message of 0001 why it is necessary to use > log_cnt when setting the sequence. Can you explain what the problem > will be if we don't use log_cnt during sequence sync?
I thought to keep the log_cnt value the same value as the publisher. I have verified from the upgrade that we don't retain the log_cnt value after upgrade, even if we copy log_cnt, the value will not be retained. The attached v20251006-0001-Enhance-pg_get_sequence_data-function.patch has the changes to remove log_cnt. Regards, Vignesh
v20251006-0001-Enhance-pg_get_sequence_data-function.patch
Description: Binary data
