On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 8:16 PM Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > I rewrote the random_page_cost docs, attached, to remove a focus on > magnetic disk, and added network latency as a reason for > random_page_cost being low. I removed the specific caching numbers and > went with a more generic description. > > I would normally apply this only to master, but given the complaints in > this thread, maybe I should backpatch it.
This seems fine to me but I won't be surprised if other people have some complaints. :-) -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
