On Thu, 9 Oct 2025 at 05:57, Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2025-Oct-08, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > > ereport(ERROR, > > (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), > > errmsg("BUFFER_USAGE_LIMIT option must be 0 or between %d kB > > and %d kB", > > MIN_BAS_VAC_RING_SIZE_KB, MAX_BAS_VAC_RING_SIZE_KB), > > hintmsg ? errhint("%s", _(hintmsg)) : 0)); > > > > Should we also change this for consistency with how we handle other > > VACUUM options? > > I would appreciate that, and also a change there from errhint() to > errhint_internal.
Ok, I've adjusted that in the attached. David
adjust_vacuum_parallel_option_handling_code_v2.patch
Description: Binary data
