On Monday, October 13, 2025, David Rowley <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 at 17:09, David G. Johnston > <[email protected]> wrote: > > How about: > > > > n_distinct_inherited exists to allow the distinct value estimate to be > overwritten for the children-included statistics gathered for inheritance > parent tables, and for partitioned tables. > > > > I can live with “ordinarily” with that wording, it is just the negative > of “children-included”. > > I've ended up reverting the text back to become more similar to how it > was but explicitly adding ", and for the statistics gathered for > partitioned tables.", since that's what the original bug report was > confused about. > > I've kept the other document changes as they were in the previous patch. > WFM. Since we allow 0 as an input I’m not convinced we should remove that sentence, though I concur that using reset is preferred. David J.
