Hi John, On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 3:34 AM John H <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 3) maybe we can improve the error messages for the > > last 2 checks in tap test, that because of this > > reason hence proven that the copy from source to > > target has been done. > > What are you thinking of? Something like the below? > > + "Expected WAL segment $corrupt_wal_seg to have been modified > due to rewind"); > + "Expected WAL segment $corrupt_wal_seg to have been synced > from source to target after rewind"); > maybe something like this + "Expected WAL segment $corrupt_wal_seg to have later mtime on target than source after rewind as it was copied"); + "Expected WAL segment $corrupt_wal_seg file sizes to be same between target and source after rewind as it was copied"); -- Thanks, Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
