On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 06:32:01PM +1300, David Rowley wrote: > I'd leave it as uint64. There's no reason to mixup the signedness > between these two variables.
That's fine as well. > I'm happy to finish this one off. I was leaving it for Tomas to > comment, but I think he'll be busy with pgconf.eu for the next few > days. Cool, thanks. I'm leaving that stuff up to any of you, have fun. FWIW, I am on the same line as you. Your suggestions are better than what the proposed patch does, as far as I've looked. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
