út 21. 10. 2025 v 9:38 odesílatel Álvaro Herrera <[email protected]> napsal:
> On 2025-Oct-20, David G. Johnston wrote: > > > Thank you. Seems good from a quick read. I’m regretting the choice of > the > > display_ prefix; is there any technical limitation or other opposition to > > using just true and false? > > > > \pset true ‘true’ > > \pset false ‘false’ > > > > To keep in line with: > > > > \pset null ‘(null)’ > > Uhm. I don't know. No technical limitation AFAICS. It looks a bit > weird to me, because those names are so generic; but also I cannot > really object to them. That said, such a last-minute bikeshed comment > seems like a perfect way to kill your patch. > I'll gladly take a vote. > I think so this is little bit different case In this context I see three "safe" variants like short: t, f long: true, false localized: nepravda, pravda (if this is available) localized short is probably very messy - like 'n' and 'p' for Czech language and never be used In the Czech environment we mostly don't translate boolean constants in computer science. Regards Pavel Null is different - there is not known any formal symbol for null. > -- > Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — > https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ > "On the other flipper, one wrong move and we're Fatal Exceptions" > (T.U.X.: Term Unit X - http://www.thelinuxreview.com/TUX/) > > >
