On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 1:01 PM jian he <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you, I agree with Álvaro. So, I think it is better to leave them > > as they are, except for access/relation.h. And, replacing > > relation_open to table_open looks good to me. > > > > ok. > > The attached patch only replaces relation_open to table_open. > RangeVarCallbackForPolicy already checks that a policy can only be created on > a > table or a partitioned table. > > so the replacement should be ok.
Thank you for updating the patch. But I said "except for access/relation.h". I think access/relation.h is not necessary if you replace relation_open to table_open. -- Best regards, Shinya Kato NTT OSS Center
